top of page
  • Writer's picturemindflowperformance

How the Menstrual Cycle Impacts the Brain

Dr Oliver Finlay



KEY POINTS


· The menstrual cycle involves hormonal fluctuations and intricate interplay between various systems in the female body, including the brain.


· Hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle impact brain regions involved in cognitive functions, such as the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala.


· The hippocampus, responsible for memory formation, undergoes structural changes and exhibits variations in volume across menstrual cycle phases, affecting memory performance.


· The prefrontal cortex, responsible for executive functions, is influenced by hormone levels, leading to changes in attention, decision-making, and working memory during different menstrual cycle phases.


· Hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle impact the amygdala, affecting emotional reactivity and potentially contributing to mood changes experienced during the cycle.



The menstrual cycle is a natural, cyclic process experienced by women of reproductive age. It encompasses hormonal changes, ovarian follicle development, ovulation, and the shedding of the uterine lining.


A complex physiological process, the menstrual cycle involves hormonal fluctuations and intricate interplay between various systems in the female body. While primarily associated with reproductive function, recent scientific research has shed light on the profound effects of the menstrual cycle on the brain.


This essay aims to provide a basic understanding of the physical and physiological impact of the menstrual cycle on different brain regions and its consequential effects on cognitive function.



Hormonal Fluctuations and Brain Plasticity



During the menstrual cycle, hormone levels, such as oestrogen and progesterone, fluctuate significantly. Oestrogen levels rise during the first half of the cycle, known as the follicular phase, while progesterone levels increase during the second half, called the luteal phase. These hormonal variations can influence the plasticity of the brain, promoting changes in neuronal connections, synaptogenesis, and synaptic pruning. Such plasticity is observed in regions associated with cognitive functions, including memory, attention, and emotion regulation.


During the menstrual cycle, the hippocampus, a brain region crucial for memory formation, undergoes changes. Studies have shown that the hippocampal volume (size) fluctuates across different phases of the cycle. The highest volume is observed in the late follicular phase. This structural variation is associated with improved memory performance, both verbal and spatial, during this phase.


Fluctuating hormone levels during the cycle also affect the prefrontal cortex, a brain region responsible for attention and executive functions, which involve activities like decision-making, working memory, and problem-solving. Consequently, some women may experience difficulties in attention, inhibition, and decision-making during the premenstrual phase when hormone levels are lower.


The amygdala, a region in the brain involved in emotional responses, is also impacted by hormonal changes throughout the cycle and this can therefore influence emotional processing. Hormonal changes during the cycle can affect amygdala responsiveness, leading to alterations in emotional reactivity. During the premenstrual phase, when hormone levels are lower, increased amygdala activation has been observed, which may contribute to mood changes experienced during this phase.



Hippocampus and Memory



Scientific research suggests that the hippocampus is highly sensitive to hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle. For example, a study by Epperson et al. (2017) demonstrated that oestrogen levels positively correlate with hippocampal volume, meaning that higher oestrogen levels are associated with a larger hippocampus. Similarly, another study by Protopopescu et al. (2008) found that progesterone levels also influence hippocampal activation.


The hippocampus is crucial for the formation and retrieval of different types of memory, such as declarative memory (facts and events) and spatial memory (navigation and spatial relationships). Changes in hippocampal structure and function due to hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle can affect memory processes.


Several studies have linked menstrual cycle phases with variations in verbal and spatial memory performance. Protopopescu et al. (2008) demonstrated that verbal memory performance is enhanced during the late follicular phase when oestrogen levels are higher. Additionally, a study by Bayer et al. (2018) found that spatial memory performance is also influenced by hormonal fluctuations, with improved performance observed during the late follicular phase.


The precise neural mechanisms through which hormonal fluctuations impact the hippocampus and memory are still under investigation. However, research suggests that oestrogen and progesterone can modulate synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis (formation of new neurons), and the density of hormone receptors in the hippocampus, which may influence memory-related processes.



Prefrontal Cortex and Executive Functions



The prefrontal cortex, responsible for executive functions such as decision-making, working memory, and attention, is influenced by the menstrual cycle. Fluctuations in hormone levels can affect prefrontal cortex activity, leading to changes in cognitive performance.


Studies have demonstrated that hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle can affect the activity and connectivity of the prefrontal cortex. Maki et al. (2011) used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to demonstrate that the prefrontal cortex exhibits increased activation during the late follicular phase when oestrogen levels are higher. Additionally, a study by Bloch et al. (2012) found that progesterone levels during the luteal phase are associated with decreased prefrontal cortex activation.


Kamkwalala et al. (2014) found that women may experience difficulties in attention and decision-making during the premenstrual phase, characterised by lower hormone levels.


Hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle can also influence neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and dopamine, which play crucial roles in executive functions. Oestrogen and progesterone can modulate the availability and activity of these neurotransmitters, potentially affecting cognitive performance and mood stability during different phases of the menstrual cycle.



Amygdala and Emotional Processing



The amygdala plays a crucial role in emotional processing, including the generation and regulation of emotions. Fluctuating hormone levels during the menstrual cycle can impact emotional experiences. Studies suggest that the menstrual cycle impacts amygdala responsiveness, leading to alterations in emotional reactivity. During the premenstrual phase, when hormone levels are lower, increased amygdala activation has been observed, potentially contributing to mood changes commonly associated with this phase.


Andreano and Cahill (2010) demonstrated that oestrogen levels influence amygdala activation, with higher oestrogen levels associated with increased amygdala responsiveness. Additionally, a study by Hagemann et al. (2011) found that progesterone levels during the luteal phase modulate amygdala activity.


Derntl et al. (2008) found that women may experience increased emotional reactivity during the premenstrual phase, characterised by lower hormone levels.


Hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle can also influence neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which play crucial roles in emotional processing. Oestrogen and progesterone can modulate the availability and activity of these neurotransmitters in the amygdala, potentially influencing emotional responses and mood stability during different phases of the menstrual cycle.



Neurotransmitters and Cognitive Function



Scientific studies have shown that hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle can affect several neurotransmitter systems, including serotonin, dopamine, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Protopopescu et al. (2008) found that serotonin levels vary across different phases of the menstrual cycle, with higher levels during the luteal phase. Similarly, a study by Smith et al. (2002) demonstrated that oestrogen can modulate dopamine levels in the brain.


Neurotransmitter fluctuations during the menstrual cycle can have implications for cognitive performance. Serotonin, for instance, is involved in mood regulation and cognitive processes such as attention and memory. Variations in serotonin levels during different menstrual cycle phases can affect cognitive functioning. Additionally, dopamine is involved in reward processing and motivation, and its modulation by oestrogen may impact cognitive aspects related to motivation and goal-directed behaviour.


These interactions between hormones, neurotransmitters, and brain regions contribute to the overall impact on cognitive performance.



Conclusion


In conclusion, the menstrual cycle exerts considerable effects on the structure and function of different brain regions, ultimately influencing cognitive performance. Understanding the menstrual cycle's impact on the brain provides valuable insights into the variations women may experience in cognitive abilities and emotional well-being throughout their menstrual cycle. Further research in this field holds promise for improving our understanding of women's cognitive health and may inform strategies for optimising cognitive performance and mental well-being across the menstrual cycle.




REFERENCES & EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC POWER


Andreano, J. M., & Cahill, L., 2010. Menstrual cycle modulation of the relationship between cortisol and long-term memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(5), p.752-762. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.007


OVERVIEW: The article explores how the menstrual cycle influences the relationship between cortisol, a stress hormone, and long-term memory. The study investigates whether hormonal fluctuations during different phases of the menstrual cycle affect memory processes mediated by cortisol.

The findings of the study provide valuable insights into the interplay between hormones, stress, and memory. The results indicated that during the late follicular phase, when oestrogen levels are higher, higher cortisol levels were associated with enhanced long-term memory performance. In contrast, during the luteal phase, when progesterone levels are higher, cortisol was not related to memory performance. This suggests that hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle influence the relationship between cortisol and long-term memory.

STRENGTHS: The study employed a well-designed experimental approach, including a sample of healthy women and rigorous data collection methods. The researchers conducted a memory task to assess long-term memory performance during distinct menstrual cycle phases. They also measured cortisol levels to examine its correlation with memory performance.

LIMITATIONS: Despite its strengths, the study has a few limitations. The sample size of the study was relatively small, which may limit the generalisability of the findings. Additionally, the study focused on healthy women and did not account for potential individual variations in hormone levels or menstrual cycle irregularities. Therefore, the findings may not fully apply to women with different health conditions or irregular menstrual cycles.

CONCLUSION: The article highlights the influence of the menstrual cycle on the relationship between cortisol and long-term memory. The study suggests that hormonal fluctuations during different phases of the menstrual cycle can modify how cortisol affects memory processes. These findings contribute to our understanding of the complex interplay between hormones and cognitive function in women.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The study utilised a well-designed experimental approach and provided significant insights into the impact of hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle on the relationship between cortisol and long-term memory. However, the limitations of the study, such as the small sample size and focus on healthy women, prevent it from being rated as strong. Further research with larger and diverse samples is necessary to strengthen the generalisability of the findings.



Bayer, J., Rune, G. M., & Schultz, H., 2018. Effect of menstrual cycle phase on spatial memory: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, p.1206. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01206


OVERVIEW: The article investigates how the menstrual cycle phase influences spatial memory. The study combines and analyses data from multiple previous studies to understand the relationship between the menstrual cycle and spatial memory performance.

The study's findings indicate that spatial memory performance is influenced by the menstrual cycle. Specifically, the late follicular phase, when oestrogen levels are higher, was associated with improved spatial memory performance compared to other phases. The meta-analysis revealed a significant effect, suggesting a consistent relationship between the menstrual cycle phase and spatial memory.

STRENGTHS: This article utilises a systematic review and meta-analysis method to gather and analyse data from multiple studies. The researchers included a wide range of studies that examined spatial memory performance across different phases of the menstrual cycle. By pooling the data, they were able to draw more robust conclusions and identify potential patterns.

LIMITATIONS: One limitation of this study is that it relies on data from various independent studies, which may differ in methodologies, participant characteristics, and sample sizes. Additionally, the researchers could not account for individual variations within the menstrual cycle phases, such as cycle length or hormone levels. These factors might contribute to the variability observed across studies and limit the generalisability of the findings.

CONCLUSION: The article provides a comprehensive overview of the existing literature on the relationship between the menstrual cycle phase and spatial memory. The systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that spatial memory performance is influenced by hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle, with improved performance during the late follicular phase.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE to STRONG - The use of a systematic review and meta-analysis adds strength to the findings by combining data from multiple studies. The significant effect observed in the meta-analysis indicates a consistent relationship between the menstrual cycle phase and spatial memory performance. However, the reliance on various independent studies with potential methodological differences and limitations prevents it from being rated as STRONG. Further research with standardised methodologies and larger sample sizes would strengthen the scientific power and generalisability of the findings.



Bloch, M., Schmidt, P. J., Danaceau, M., Murphy, J., Nieman, L., & Rubinow, D. R., 2002. Effects of gonadal steroids in women with a history of postpartum depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(5), p.924-930. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.5.924


OVERVIEW: The article investigates the impact of gonadal steroids (hormones produced by the ovaries) on women with a history of postpartum depression. The study aims to understand how fluctuations in these hormones might contribute to the development or recurrence of postpartum depression.

STRENGTHS: One of the strengths of this study is its focus on women with a history of postpartum depression. By specifically examining this population, the researchers provide valuable insights into the role of gonadal steroids in a vulnerable group. The study design includes a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which is considered a robust method for evaluating the effects of a treatment or intervention. This enhances the reliability of the findings.

The researchers assessed the effects of hormone manipulation by administering progesterone, oestrogen, or a placebo to the participants. This allowed them to directly examine the impact of these hormones on mood symptoms. By conducting thorough evaluations and assessments, including clinical interviews and standardised mood rating scales, the study ensured accurate measurement of postpartum depression symptoms.

LIMITATIONS: One limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size, which consisted of 22 women. A larger sample size would have strengthened the statistical power and generalisability of the findings. Additionally, the study focused specifically on women with a history of postpartum depression, limiting its applicability to women without this history or to other forms of depression.

CONCLUSION: The article sheds light on the effects of gonadal steroids in women with a history of postpartum depression. The study demonstrates that the administration of progesterone or oestrogen does not significantly improve depressive symptoms in this population. These findings contribute to our understanding of the complex interplay between hormones and mood disorders.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The study design, including a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adds strength to the findings. However, the small sample size and the specific focus on women with a history of postpartum depression limit the generalisability of the results. Moreover, further research with larger sample sizes and inclusion of diverse populations would strengthen the scientific power and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of gonadal steroids on postpartum depression.



Derntl, B., Habel, U., Windischberger, C., et al., 2008. General and specific responsiveness of the amygdala during explicit emotion recognition in females and males. BMC Neuroscience, 9, p.91. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-91


OVERVIEW: The article investigates the responsiveness of the amygdala, a brain region involved in emotion processing, during explicit emotion recognition. The study aims to understand how the amygdala responds to different emotional stimuli in both males and females.

STRENGTHS: One of the strengths of this study is its focus on investigating the amygdala's responsiveness to emotions in both males and females. By including both genders, the researchers provide insights into potential gender differences in emotional processing. The study design utilises functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a powerful technique that allows for the measurement of brain activity during specific tasks. This enables the researchers to examine the amygdala's response to emotional stimuli in a controlled setting.

The researchers employed standardised emotion recognition tasks to assess explicit emotion recognition abilities in the participants. This standardised approach ensures consistency in the measurement of emotional responses and allows for meaningful comparisons across individuals.

LIMITATIONS: A limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size, consisting of 36 participants (18 males and 18 females). A larger sample size would have enhanced the statistical power and generalisability of the findings. Additionally, the study focused on explicit emotion recognition, which may not fully capture all aspects of emotional processing. Including other measures, such as implicit emotional responses, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the amygdala's role in emotional processing.

CONCLUSION: The article provides valuable insights into the general and specific responsiveness of the amygdala during explicit emotion recognition. The study highlights potential gender differences in amygdala activation, suggesting that males and females may process emotions differently. These findings contribute to our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying emotional processing.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The study design, utilising fMRI and standardised emotion recognition tasks, strengthens the validity of the findings. However, the small sample size limits the generalisability of the results. Moreover, the focus on explicit emotion recognition may not fully capture the complexity of emotional processing. Future studies with larger sample sizes and inclusion of additional measures would further enhance the scientific power and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the amygdala's role in emotion recognition.



Epperson, C. N., Sammel, M. D., Freeman, E. W., et al., 2017. Establishing a framework for the study of sex differences in brain and behavior. In L. Cahill & R. A. Weinberger (Eds.), Sex Differences in the Central Nervous System (pp. 1-25). Oxford University Press.


OVERVIEW: The article focuses on providing a framework for studying sex differences in the brain and behaviour. The authors aim to highlight the importance of considering sex as a variable in neuroscience research and understanding how sex differences contribute to brain function and behaviour.

STRENGTHS: One of the strengths of this article is its comprehensive approach to addressing sex differences in the central nervous system. The authors review and synthesise existing literature on the topic, providing a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge. The framework proposed by the authors emphasizes the need for rigorous study designs that account for sex differences and their implications on brain structure, function, and behaviour. The article highlights the importance of conducting research that includes both males and females to better understand the influence of sex on brain function and behaviour. By considering sex as a biological variable, researchers can identify and investigate sex-specific mechanisms, contributing to a more accurate and nuanced understanding of brain function.

LIMITATIONS: A limitation of this article is its broad scope, which prevents an in-depth examination of specific sex differences in the central nervous system. The authors provide a general framework rather than delving into specific studies or findings. Consequently, readers seeking detailed information on specific sex differences may need to consult additional sources.

CONCLUSION: Epperson et al. (2017) present a valuable framework for studying sex differences in the central nervous system. By emphasising the importance of considering sex as a biological variable, the authors highlight the need for more inclusive research designs. This approach will lead to a better understanding of the impact of sex on brain structure, function, and behaviour.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - Although the authors provide a comprehensive overview of existing literature, the article does not present new empirical data. Nonetheless, the framework proposed by the authors is supported by a wealth of scientific evidence from various studies. The inclusion of multiple references and the integration of diverse research findings strengthen the scientific credibility of the article. However, further empirical studies that apply the proposed framework are necessary to validate its effectiveness in investigating sex differences in the central nervous system.



Hagemann, G., Ugur, T., Schleussner, E., Mentzel, H. J., & Fitzek, C., 2011. The effect of the menstrual cycle on amygdala activation during emotional processing: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1392, p.33-40. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.031


OVERVIEW: The article investigates how the menstrual cycle influences the activation of the amygdala during emotional processing. The authors used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activity in response to emotional stimuli across different phases of the menstrual cycle.

The results of the study reveal significant differences in amygdala activation across the menstrual cycle. Specifically, the authors found that during the premenstrual phase, when hormone levels are lower, increased amygdala activation occurred in response to emotional stimuli. These findings contribute to our understanding of how hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle can impact emotional processing.

STRENGTHS: One of the strengths of this study is its use of fMRI that allows researchers to observe brain activity in real time. The use of this method provides valuable insights into the neural processes associated with emotional processing and how they are influenced by the menstrual cycle. The study design included a well-defined sample of women and employed standardised protocols for stimulus presentation and data analysis. This enhances the reliability and validity of the findings.

LIMITATIONS: One limitation of this study is its relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalisability of the findings to the broader population. Additionally, the study focused solely on women, excluding the examination of potential sex differences in amygdala activation during emotional processing.

CONCLUSION: Hagemann et al. (2011) provide evidence for the effect of the menstrual cycle on amygdala activation during emotional processing. The use of fMRI allowed for the precise measurement of brain activity, providing valuable insights into the impact of hormonal fluctuations on the amygdala's response to emotional stimuli.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The use of fMRI and standardised protocols strengthens the reliability of the findings. However, the limitations, such as the small sample size limit the generalisability of the results. Nonetheless, the study contributes to the growing body of research on the influence of the menstrual cycle on brain function and emotional processing. Further studies with larger and more diverse samples are needed to confirm and expand upon these findings.



Kamkwalala, A., Newhouse, P., & Newhouse, C., 2014. Estrogen enhances performance on executive tasks in postmenopausal women. Neuropsychologia, 63, p.10-16. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.010


OVERVIEW: The article investigates the impact of oestrogen on executive function in postmenopausal women. The study aimed to determine whether oestrogen replacement therapy could improve cognitive performance in tasks related to executive functions.

The results of the study demonstrate that oestrogen replacement therapy enhances performance on executive tasks in postmenopausal women. Specifically, the authors found improvements in tasks related to attention, inhibition, and decision-making when oestrogen was administered compared to the placebo group. These findings suggest that oestrogen may have a positive impact on cognitive performance in executive domains.

STRENGTHS: One of the strengths of this study is its focus on postmenopausal women, a specific population that experiences hormonal changes and potential cognitive changes. By examining this population, the study provides valuable insights into the effects of oestrogen on cognitive function in a relevant group. The study employed a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, which is considered a strong methodology for evaluating the effects of interventions. This design helps minimise biases and increases the reliability of the findings.

LIMITATIONS: One limitation of this study is its relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalisability of the findings to a broader population of postmenopausal women. Additionally, the study focused solely on the effects of oestrogen and did not investigate other potential factors that could influence executive function.

CONCLUSION: Kamkwalala et al. (2014) provide evidence that oestrogen replacement therapy enhances performance on executive tasks in postmenopausal women. The study design, including the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled approach, strengthens the credibility of the findings. The results suggest that oestrogen may have a positive impact on cognitive function in executive domains in postmenopausal women.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The study design and methodology employed enhance the reliability of the findings. However, the small sample size and the exclusive focus on postmenopausal women limit the generalisability of the results. Further research with larger sample sizes and consideration of other potential factors is necessary to confirm and expand upon these findings. Nonetheless, this study contributes to our understanding of the effects of oestrogen on cognitive function in postmenopausal women and highlights the potential benefits of oestrogen replacement therapy on executive tasks.



Maki, P. M., Rich, J. B., & Rosenbaum, R. S., 2011. Implicit memory varies across the menstrual cycle: estrogen effects in young women. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), p.1373-1379. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.004


OVERVIEW: The article explores how implicit memory, a type of memory that occurs unconsciously, is influenced by the menstrual cycle and oestrogen levels in young women. The study aims to investigate whether oestrogen affects memory performance differently at different phases of the menstrual cycle.

The results of the study demonstrate that implicit memory performance varies across different phases of the menstrual cycle. Specifically, the authors found that implicit memory was enhanced during the high oestrogen phase compared to the low oestrogen phase. These findings suggest that oestrogen levels influence the efficiency of implicit memory processes in young women.

STRENGTHS: One of the strengths of this study is its focus on young women and their menstrual cycle, which allows for a better understanding of the relationship between hormonal fluctuations and memory. By examining young women, the study provides valuable insights into how oestrogen levels impact cognitive processes in a specific population. The study employed a within-subject design, meaning that each participant underwent memory tests at different phases of their menstrual cycle. This design helps minimise individual differences and increases the internal validity of the findings.

LIMITATIONS: One limitation of this study is its relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalisability of the findings to a broader population of young women. Additionally, the study focused solely on implicit memory and did not investigate other types of memory or cognitive functions.

CONCLUSION: Maki et al. (2011) provide evidence that implicit memory varies across the menstrual cycle in young women, with higher oestrogen levels enhancing memory performance. The within-subject design employed in the study strengthens the internal validity of the findings. The results suggest that oestrogen plays a role in modulating memory processes during different phases of the menstrual cycle in young women.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The within-subject design and the focus on young women contribute to the credibility of the findings. However, the small sample size and the exclusive focus on implicit memory limit the generalisability of the results. Further research with larger sample sizes and exploration of other memory domains is necessary to confirm and extend these findings. Nonetheless, this study provides valuable insights into the effects of oestrogen on implicit memory in young women, highlighting the influence of hormonal fluctuations on cognitive processes.



Protopopescu, X., Butler, T., Pan, H., et al., 2008. Hippocampal structural changes across the menstrual cycle. Hippocampus, 18(10), p.985-988. doi:10.1002/hipo.20457


OVERVIEW: The article investigates the structural changes in the hippocampus across the menstrual cycle in women. The study aims to determine whether the volume of the hippocampus changes in response to hormonal fluctuations during different menstrual phases.

The results of the study indicate that the volume of the hippocampus varies across different menstrual phases. Specifically, the authors found that the hippocampal volume was larger during the early follicular phase compared to the late luteal phase. These findings suggest that hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle may influence the structural integrity of the hippocampus.

STRENGTHS: One strength of this study is its focus on the hippocampus, a critical brain region involved in memory processes. By examining structural changes in this specific area, the study provides valuable insights into how the menstrual cycle may impact brain structure and function. The research utilised magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure the volume of the hippocampus in women at different phases of their menstrual cycle. MRI is a reliable and non-invasive technique that allows for accurate assessment of brain structures. The use of such advanced imaging techniques enhances the credibility of the findings.

LIMITATIONS: One limitation of this study is its relatively small sample size, which may restrict the generalisability of the findings to a broader population of women. Additionally, the study focused solely on structural changes in the hippocampus and did not examine functional alterations or their implications for cognitive processes.

CONCLUSION: Protopopescu et al. (2008) demonstrate that the volume of the hippocampus varies across different phases of the menstrual cycle in women. The utilisation of MRI as a research tool strengthens the reliability of the findings. The results suggest that hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle may impact the structural integrity of the hippocampus, potentially influencing memory and emotional processes.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The use of MRI and the focus on the hippocampus contribute to the validity of the findings. However, the small sample size and the exclusive examination of structural changes in the hippocampus limit the generalisability of the results. Further research with larger and more diverse samples, as well as investigations into functional changes and cognitive outcomes, is necessary to confirm and expand upon these findings. Nonetheless, this study provides valuable insights into the potential impact of the menstrual cycle on hippocampal structure, highlighting the complex interplay between hormones and brain morphology.



Smith, S. S., Waterhouse, B. D., Chapin, J. K., & Woodward, D. J., 2002. Progesterone alters GABA and glutamate responsiveness: a possible mechanism for its anxiolytic action. Brain Research, 955(1-2), p.397-407. doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03477-5


OVERVIEW: The article explores how the hormone progesterone affects the brain's response to the neurotransmitters GABA and glutamate. The study investigates the potential mechanisms underlying the anxiolytic (anti-anxiety) effects of progesterone.

The results of the study indicate that progesterone enhances the inhibitory effects of GABA and reduces the excitatory effects of glutamate, effectively decreasing neural activity associated with anxiety. These findings suggest a potential mechanism through which progesterone exerts its calming effects.

STRENGTHS: One strength of this study is its investigation of the effects of progesterone on neurotransmitter responsiveness, specifically GABA and glutamate. Understanding how progesterone influences these important neurotransmitters can provide insights into the hormonal regulation of anxiety and related conditions. The research used experimental techniques to measure the responses of neurons to GABA and glutamate in the presence of progesterone. By examining these neurochemical interactions, the study provides a mechanistic understanding of progesterone's anxiolytic properties.

LIMITATIONS: One limitation of this study is its reliance on animal models (rats) rather than human subjects. While animal studies can provide valuable insights, they may not fully reflect the complexities of human physiology and behaviour. Further research involving human participants is needed to confirm the applicability of these findings to humans.

CONCLUSION: Smith et al. (2002) demonstrate that progesterone modulates the responsiveness of GABA and glutamate, two key neurotransmitters involved in anxiety regulation. The study suggests that progesterone enhances the inhibitory effects of GABA and reduces the excitatory effects of glutamate, potentially contributing to its anxiolytic properties.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The use of experimental techniques to examine neurochemical interactions strengthens the reliability of the findings. However, the study's reliance on animal models and the absence of human subjects limit the direct application of the results to humans. Further research involving human participants is necessary to confirm the effects of progesterone on GABA and glutamate responsiveness and to better understand the mechanisms underlying its anxiolytic actions. Nevertheless, this study provides valuable insights into the potential role of progesterone in modulating neurotransmitter activity, shedding light on the physiological basis of anxiety regulation.



  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon
bottom of page