top of page
  • Writer's picturemindflowperformance

The Impact of Chronic Stress on Cognitive Performance

Dr Oliver Finlay



KEY POINTS


·      Chronic stress induces changes in the brain's structure and function, impacting the hippocampus and amygdala crucial for memory and emotional responses.

 

·      Prolonged exposure to stress hormones like cortisol can decrease the size of the hippocampus, potentially leading to memory deficits.

 

·      The delicate balance of neurotransmitters, including serotonin and dopamine, is disrupted by chronic stress, impacting mood disorders and cognitive functions like attention and decision-making.

 

·      Chronic stress triggers inflammatory processes, affecting neural circuits and potentially contributing to cognitive impairments.

 

·      Physiological changes induced by chronic stress directly influence cognitive performance, leading to difficulties in memory formation, heightened emotional responses, and impaired attention and focus.

 

 

Introduction


Stress is an inevitable part of life, and acute stress is a productive stimulus. However, when stress becomes chronic, it can take a toll on both mental and physical well-being. Scientific research has delved into the impact of chronic stress on the brain, shedding light on how it affects our physiology and, in turn, cognitive performance. This essay will explore key findings from peer-reviewed scientific articles to understand the intricate relationship between chronic stress, the brain, and cognitive function.



The Physiological Impact



Chronic stress doesn't just affect our mood; it also induces changes in the structure and function of the brain. A study by McEwen (2017) emphasises that prolonged exposure to stress hormones, like cortisol, can lead to alterations in the hippocampus, a brain region crucial for memory and learning. Chronic stress has been linked to a decrease in the size of the hippocampus, potentially contributing to memory deficits observed in individuals dealing with chronic stress.


Moreover, the amygdala, a region involved in emotional responses, undergoes changes in response to chronic stress. Research by Herman et al. (2016) explains that chronic stress can result in an overactive amygdala, leading to heightened emotional responses and difficulties in regulating emotions.



Neurotransmitter Imbalance



Chronic stress disrupts the delicate balance of neurotransmitters, the brain's chemical messengers. Mora et al (2012) and Pani et al (2000) discuss how chronic stress can lead to an imbalance in neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine. These imbalances may contribute to mood disorders and impact cognitive functions like attention and decision-making.



Inflammatory Processes



Chronic stress triggers inflammatory processes in the body, as highlighted by Miller and Raison (2016). Inflammation, originally a defence mechanism, becomes problematic when it becomes chronic. This sustained inflammation can affect the brain, leading to alterations in neural circuits and potentially contributing to cognitive impairments.



Impact on Cognitive Performance



The physiological changes induced by chronic stress have direct consequences on cognitive performance. Sapolsky (2015) outlines how the hippocampal changes observed in chronic stress can result in difficulties in forming new memories and recalling information. Additionally, the impact on the amygdala can lead to heightened emotional responses, potentially interfering with decision-making and problem-solving abilities.


Attention and concentration are also affected by chronic stress. Yerkes and Dodson (1908) introduced the Yerkes-Dodson law, which suggests that moderate stress levels may enhance performance, but chronic stress can impair attention and focus. Recent studies, such as that by Evans et al. (2013), support this notion, emphasising the importance of maintaining an optimal stress level for cognitive functioning.



Conclusion


In conclusion, chronic stress is not just a mental burden; it manifests physically in the brain, influencing its structure and function. The physiological impact of chronic stress has cascading effects on neurotransmitter balance, inflammatory processes, and ultimately, cognitive performance. Understanding this relationship is crucial for individuals dealing with chronic stress and for developing strategies to mitigate its cognitive consequences.



 

References & Scientific Power Evaluation

 

Borodovitsyna, O., Joshi, N. and Chandler, D., 2018. Persistent stress-induced neuroplastic changes in the locus coeruleus/norepinephrine system. Neural Plasticity2018.

 

OVERVIEW: The article explores how ongoing stress affects a specific brain system called the locus coeruleus/norepinephrine (LC/NE) system. The authors investigate the long-lasting alterations in this system due to persistent stress and how it impacts our overall brain function.

STRENGTHS: This article excels in delving into the persistent effects of stress on the LC/NE system. The authors provide a clear overview of how ongoing stress can lead to lasting changes in this crucial brain system. The strength lies in the specificity of the focus on the LC/NE system, allowing for a more in-depth understanding of the neural changes induced by persistent stress. The article's emphasis on neuroplasticity, the brain's ability to adapt, adds depth to our comprehension of stress-related alterations.

LIMITATIONS: The specificity of the focus on the LC/NE system may limit the broader applicability of the findings to other brain regions. The dynamic nature of stress responses and individual differences in stress sensitivity pose challenges to generalising the results. Additionally, the complexity of neuroplastic changes introduces uncertainties about causation and the full scope of consequences.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of the long-term effects of stress on the LC/NE system. By exploring persistent stress-induced neuroplastic changes, the authors provide a valuable foundation for comprehending how ongoing stress can lead to lasting alterations in this specific brain system.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE to STRONG - The specific focus on the LC/NE system enhances the reliability of the information within that context. However, the limitations associated with generalisability and the complexity of neuroplastic changes introduce some level of uncertainty. Nevertheless, the article serves as a meaningful exploration into the persistent neuroplastic changes induced by ongoing stress in the LC/NE system. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of stress by focusing on the persistent neuroplastic changes in the LC/NE system. While recognising certain limitations, the study provides a comprehensive and insightful exploration of how ongoing stress can induce lasting alterations in this specific brain system.

 

 

Evans, G.W., Li, D. and Whipple, S.S., 2013. Cumulative risk and child development. Psychological Bulletin139(6), p.1342.

 

OVERVIEW: The article explores the impact of multiple environmental stressors on child development. The authors investigate how the accumulation of various risks, like poverty and family turmoil, influences a child's cognitive and emotional growth.

STRENGTHS: This article excels in comprehensively addressing the cumulative impact of various risks on child development. Evans et al. (2013) provide a clear overview of how factors like poverty and family stress, when combined, can significantly affect a child's well-being. The strength lies in the integration of diverse research findings, offering a holistic understanding of the challenges children may face in complex environments. The authors highlight the importance of considering cumulative risk, adding depth to our understanding of the developmental process.

LIMITATIONS: The complexity of cumulative risk makes it challenging to pinpoint specific causal relationships between individual stressors and developmental outcomes. The article emphasises correlation rather than causation, acknowledging the intricate interplay of various factors. Additionally, the focus on a broad range of risks may overlook specific nuances in different contexts.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of child development by emphasising the cumulative impact of multiple risks. By examining the combined effects of various stressors, the authors provide a valuable foundation for comprehending the challenges children may encounter in multifaceted environments.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE to STRONG - The integration of diverse research findings enhances the reliability of the information, providing a comprehensive view of cumulative risk. However, the limitations associated with establishing causation and the complexity of developmental processes introduce some level of uncertainty. Nevertheless, the article serves as a robust introduction to understanding how the accumulation of risks can influence child development. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of child development by focusing on cumulative risk. While recognising certain limitations, the study provides a comprehensive and insightful exploration of how various environmental stressors, when combined, can impact the cognitive and emotional development of children.

 

 

Godoy, L.D., Rossignoli, M.T., Delfino-Pereira, P., Garcia-Cairasco, N. and de Lima Umeoka, E.H., 2018. A comprehensive overview on stress neurobiology: basic concepts and clinical implications. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience12, p.127.

 

OVERVIEW: The article offers a deep dive into the world of stress and its effects on the brain. The authors explore fundamental ideas and practical implications of stress neurobiology, shedding light on how stress impacts both our minds and bodies.

STRENGTHS: This article excels in providing a comprehensive overview of stress and its neurobiology. Godoy et al. (2018) offer a clear summary of basic concepts. The strength lies in bridging the gap between scientific knowledge and real-world applications, discussing how stress affects not only our brains but also our overall well-being. The inclusion of clinical implications adds practical significance to the theoretical understanding of stress.

LIMITATIONS: The comprehensive nature of the overview may be overwhelming for those seeking a more focused exploration of specific aspects of stress neurobiology. The integration of various concepts may sacrifice some depth in individual areas. Additionally, the rapidly evolving field of neurobiology means that newer findings might not be fully represented.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of stress neurobiology by offering a well-rounded overview with practical implications. By combining basic concepts with clinical relevance, the authors provide a valuable foundation for comprehending the complexities of stress and its impact on our brains and bodies.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE to STRONG - The comprehensive overview enhances the reliability of the information by covering various aspects of stress neurobiology. However, the limitations associated with balancing breadth and depth, as well as potential gaps in representing the latest research, introduce some level of uncertainty. Nevertheless, the article serves as a robust introduction to understanding the fundamental concepts and practical implications of stress neurobiology. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of stress neurobiology by providing a comprehensive overview. While recognising certain limitations, the study offers a well-rounded and insightful exploration of how stress impacts the brain, making it relevant for both beginners and those interested in the practical applications of stress research.

 

 

Herman, J.P., McKlveen, J.M., Solomon, M.B., Carvalho-Netto, E. and Myers, B., 2012. Neural regulation of the stress response: glucocorticoid feedback mechanisms. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research45, pp.292-298.

 

OVERVIEW: The article delves into how our brain regulates the body's response to stress, focusing on feedback mechanisms involving a key player called glucocorticoids. The authors explore the intricate neural processes that control our stress responses and maintain a delicate balance in the body.

STRENGTHS: This article excels in providing a clear overview of how our brain manages stress through feedback mechanisms. Herman et al. (2012) offer a concise summary of the neural regulation of the stress response. The strength lies in their focus on glucocorticoids, crucial hormones in stress management, allowing readers to grasp the core mechanisms involved.

LIMITATIONS: The focused exploration on glucocorticoid feedback mechanisms may limit the broader context of stress regulation, excluding other important contributors. The concise overview might sacrifice some depth in explaining intricate neural processes. Additionally, the publication date suggests that newer research findings may not be fully covered.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of stress regulation by spotlighting glucocorticoid feedback mechanisms. By focusing on these essential components, the authors provide a valuable foundation for comprehending how our brain fine-tunes stress responses to maintain equilibrium in the body.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The focused exploration on glucocorticoid feedback mechanisms enhances the reliability of the information within that context. However, the limitations associated with excluding other stress-regulating factors and the potential gaps in representing the latest research introduce some level of uncertainty. Nevertheless, the article serves as a valuable resource for understanding the core neural processes involved in stress regulation. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of stress regulation by emphasising glucocorticoid feedback mechanisms. While recognising certain limitations, the study provides a clear and insightful exploration of how our brain manages stress responses, making it accessible for readers new to the field.

 

 

McEwen, B.S., 2017. Neurobiological and systemic effects of chronic stress. Chronic Stress1, p.2470547017692328.

 

OVERVIEW: The article explores the profound impacts of persistent stress on both our brains and the entire body. The author investigates how chronic stress can go beyond affecting just our mood, extending its reach to influence various physiological systems.

STRENGTHS: This article excels in providing a comprehensive overview of the neurobiological and systemic effects of chronic stress. McEwen (2017) offers a clear and detailed summary of how stress, when prolonged, doesn't merely stay in the mind but seeps into our entire body. The strength lies in the holistic approach, covering not only the brain but also the broader systemic consequences of chronic stress. The article's clarity makes complex concepts accessible.

LIMITATIONS: The extensive scope may result in a lack of depth in exploring specific aspects of chronic stress. Additionally, the field of stress research is continually evolving, and newer findings may not be fully incorporated due to the publication date.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of chronic stress by emphasising its widespread impact on both the neurobiological and systemic levels. By providing a thorough overview, the author offers a valuable foundation for comprehending the intricate ways in which persistent stress affects not only our minds but our entire bodies.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: STRONG - McEwen's comprehensive exploration of chronic stress, covering both neurobiological and systemic effects, enhances the reliability of the information. While the limitations associated with depth and potential gaps in representing the latest research exist, the article serves as a robust resource for understanding the broad-reaching consequences of chronic stress. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of chronic stress by emphasising its comprehensive impact. While recognising certain limitations, the study provides a clear and insightful exploration of how persistent stress influences both the brain and the entire body, making it accessible for readers new to the field.

 

 

Miller, A.H. and Raison, C.L., 2016. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nature Reviews Immunology16(1), pp.22-34.

 

OVERVIEW: The article explores the connection between inflammation and depression, shedding light on how our body's immune response may play a crucial role in mental health. The authors investigate the evolution of this relationship and its implications for treating depression.

STRENGTHS: This article provides a comprehensive overview of the link between inflammation and depression. Miller and Raison (2016) offer a clear and detailed summary of how our body's immune system, initially evolved for defence, may contribute to depressive symptoms when activated chronically. The strength lies in bridging evolutionary insights with modern treatment implications, making complex concepts accessible for readers new to the subject.

LIMITATIONS: The comprehensive scope may sacrifice some depth in explaining specific intricacies of the immune system's role in depression. Additionally, the rapidly evolving field of immunology and depression may mean that newer research findings are not fully represented.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of depression by emphasising the role of inflammation. By tracing the evolutionary roots of this relationship and discussing modern treatment implications, the authors provide a valuable foundation for comprehending the complex interplay between our immune system and mental health.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: STRONG - Miller and Raison's comprehensive exploration of the connection between inflammation and depression enhances the reliability of the information. While the limitations associated with depth and potential gaps in representing the latest research exist, the article serves as a robust resource for understanding the evolving perspectives on treating depression through immune system modulation. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of depression by emphasising the connection with inflammation. While recognising certain limitations, the study provides a clear and insightful exploration of how our immune system's role, shaped by evolution, may be pivotal in understanding and treating depression.

 

 

Mora, F., Segovia, G., Del Arco, A., de Blas, M. and Garrido, P., 2012. Stress, neurotransmitters, corticosterone and body–brain integration. Brain Research1476, pp.71-85.

 

OVERVIEW: The article delves into the intricate relationship between stress, neurotransmitters (chemical messengers in the brain), and corticosterone (a stress hormone). The authors explore how these elements work together, impacting both the body and the brain.

STRENGTHS: This article excels in providing a detailed overview of how stress influences neurotransmitters and corticosterone, creating a complex interplay between the body and the brain. Mora et al. (2012) offer a clear summary of how stress doesn't only affect our mental state but also triggers chemical changes throughout our body. The strength lies in their accessible exploration of body–brain integration.

LIMITATIONS: The comprehensive scope may result in a lack of depth in explaining specific neurotransmitter functions. Additionally, the rapidly evolving field of neurobiology and stress may mean that newer research findings are not fully represented.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of stress by emphasising the intricate connection between neurotransmitters, corticosterone, and body–brain integration. By exploring the chemical changes triggered by stress, the authors provide a valuable foundation for comprehending the holistic impact of stress on both our mental and physical well-being.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE to STRONG - Mora et al.'s comprehensive exploration of stress, neurotransmitters, and corticosterone enhances the reliability of the information. While the limitations associated with depth and potential gaps in representing the latest research exist, the article serves as a robust resource for understanding the chemical processes involved in the stress response. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of stress by emphasising the complex interactions between neurotransmitters, corticosterone, and body–brain integration. While recognising certain limitations, the study provides a clear and insightful exploration of how stress induces chemical changes, affecting both our mental and physical states.

 

 

Pani, L., Porcella, A. and Gessa, G.L., 2000. The role of stress in the pathophysiology of the dopaminergic system. Molecular Psychiatry5(1), pp.14-21.

 

OVERVIEW: The article investigates the impact of stress on the dopaminergic system, a crucial component of the brain responsible for regulating mood and motivation. The authors explore how stress can disrupt this system and contribute to mental health challenges.

STRENGTHS: This article excels in providing a focused overview of the relationship between stress and the dopaminergic system. Pani et al. (2000) offer a clear summary of how stress can influence the very system that plays a key role in our emotional well-being. The strength lies in their emphasis on a specific neurotransmitter, dopamine, making it accessible for readers new to the subject.

LIMITATIONS: The focused exploration may result in a lack of depth in explaining broader aspects of stress or the dopaminergic system. Additionally, the rapidly evolving field of neurobiology and stress may mean that newer research findings are not fully represented.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of stress by spotlighting its impact on the dopaminergic system. By homing in on dopamine, the authors provide a valuable foundation for comprehending how stress can disturb the delicate balance in the brain, influencing our emotional states.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - Pani et al.'s focused exploration enhances the reliability of the information regarding stress and the dopaminergic system. While the limitations associated with depth and potential gaps in representing the latest research exist, the article serves as a valuable resource for understanding the specific neurotransmitter-related effects of stress. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of stress by emphasising its impact on the dopaminergic system. While recognising certain limitations, the study provides a clear and insightful exploration of how stress, particularly through its effects on dopamine, can contribute to disturbances in our emotional well-being.

 

 

Sapolsky, R.M., 2015. Stress and the brain: individual variability and the inverted-U. Nature Neuroscience18(10), pp.1344-1346.

 

OVERVIEW: The article explores how stress affects the brain, considering the unique responses of individuals. The author introduces the concept of an inverted-U, suggesting that while some stress is beneficial, too much or too little can be detrimental.

STRENGTHS: This article excels in providing a concise overview of the individual variability in how stress impacts the brain. Sapolsky (2015) offers a clear summary of the inverted-U concept, making it accessible for readers new to the subject. The strength lies in acknowledging that stress isn't universally harmful and can have optimal levels for different individuals.

LIMITATIONS: The brevity may sacrifice some depth in explaining specific nuances of stress responses. Additionally, the rapidly evolving field of neurobiology and stress may mean that newer research findings are not fully represented.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of stress by highlighting individual variability in brain responses. By introducing the inverted-U concept, the author provides a valuable foundation for comprehending that stress isn't a one-size-fits-all phenomenon; optimal stress levels vary among individuals.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - Sapolsky's focused exploration of individual variability enhances the reliability of the information regarding stress and the brain. While the limitations associated with brevity and potential gaps in representing the latest research exist, the article serves as a solid resource for understanding the nuanced relationship between stress and individual differences. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of stress by emphasising the individual variability in brain responses. While recognising certain limitations, the study provides a clear and insightful exploration of how stress affects individuals differently, introducing the concept of the inverted-U to explain the optimal range of stress for different people.

 

 

Yerkes, R.M. and Dodson, J.D., 1908. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, pp.459-482


OVERVIEW: This classic article the connection between the intensity of a stimulus and the speed at which habits are formed. The authors investigate how the optimal level of stimulation for effective habit formation isn't constant but varies based on the strength of the stimulus.

STRENGTHS: This ground-breaking article excels in providing a foundational overview of the relationship between stimulus strength and habit formation. Yerkes and Dodson (1908) offer a clear and simple summary, introducing the idea that too little or too much stimulus intensity can impact the speed of forming habits. The strength lies in laying the groundwork for understanding how our responses to stimuli influence habit development.

LIMITATIONS: While the article is a cornerstone in psychology, it has limitations. The study's age may limit its application to modern neuroscience, and the simplicity of the model doesn't capture the complexity of habit formation in all contexts. Additionally, newer research may provide more nuanced insights into the interplay between stimuli and habit development.

CONCLUSION: The article significantly contributes to our understanding of habit formation by introducing the concept that stimulus strength is a critical factor. While the study is a foundational piece in psychology, it's essential to recognise its age and the evolving nature of research in this field.

SCIENTIFIC POWER: LOW to MODERATE - Yerkes and Dodson's work laid the foundation for understanding stimulus-strength relationships in habit formation, but its age and simplicity limit its application to modern neuroscience. The article remains a classic reference but should be supplemented with more recent research for a comprehensive understanding. In summary, the article significantly advances our understanding of habit formation by introducing the idea of stimulus strength's impact. While recognising its foundational role, it's crucial to acknowledge the study's age and simplicity, emphasising the need for contemporary research to build upon this classic work.

 

 

Comments


  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon
bottom of page